On the antisemitism question

Posted: 3 April 2013 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

marx on-jewish-question-karl-marx-paperback-cover-art

In all honesty, I don’t know if Karl Marx was an antisemite. And I don’t know if the charge of antisemitism is in Jonathan Sperber’s new book or is just an old shibboleth that reviewer Jonathan Freedland decides to focus on at the end of his essay. But it’s certainly long past time that we put to bed the idea that “On the Jewish Question” provides evidence of Marx’s “straightforwardly anti-Semitic” views.

Read the actual text (in either English or German). And then consult some of the scholarly literature (including the biography by Franz Mehring, Karl Marx: The Story of His Life, which remains after all these years one of the best, precisely because Mehring combines insights into Marx’s character with a sophisticated reading of Marx’s writings).

What you will find is not an essay that is antisemitic, whether straightforwardly or otherwise, but a critique of Bruno Bauer (and, implicitly, of Hegel) and an early argument in favor of “general human emancipation” as against merely “political emancipation”—an application of Ludwig Feurerbach’s notion of alienation, articulated long before Marx “discovers” communism and materialism.

In the first part, Marx criticizes Bauer for focusing on one aspect of emancipation (“Who is to emancipate? Who is to be emancipated?”) and forgetting about the other (“What kind of emancipation is in question? What conditions follow from the very nature of the emancipation that is demanded?”) and explains that political emancipation from religion (in the transition from the Christian state such as in Germany to the political state in its “completely developed form,” such as in North America) leaves religion in existence as a purely private matter, within civil society, based on the “rights of man.”

None of the so-called rights of man, therefore, go beyond egoistic man, beyond man as a member of civil society – that is, an individual withdrawn into himself, into the confines of his private interests and private caprice, and separated from the community. In the rights of man, he is far from being conceived as a species-being; on the contrary, species-life itself, society, appears as a framework external to the individuals, as a restriction of their original independence. The sole bond holding them together is natural necessity, need and private interest, the preservation of their property and their egoistic selves. . .

Hence, man was not freed from religion, he received religious freedom. He was not freed from property, he received freedom to own property. He was not freed from the egoism of business, he received freedom to engage in business.

In the second part, Marx proceeds to contest Bauer’s reduction of Jewish emancipation to a purely religious question and to transform it into a fully social question.

Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.

Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.

What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.

Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.

Far from providing evidence of Marx’s antisemitism, “On the Jewish Question” is precisely an argument in favor of social emancipation, for moving beyond a society in which “alienated man and alienated nature” have been converted “into alienable, vendible objects subjected to the slavery of egoistic need and to trading”—in other words, beyond capitalism.

About these ads
Comments
  1. Magpie says:

    Like yourself, I can’t say whether Marx was anti-Semitic or not. I never met the man.

    So, maybe he was, maybe not.

    The thing that draws my attention powerfully is that people accuse Marx of both being (1) anti-Semitic and of being (2) part of an alleged Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

    Perhaps those intent on morally murdering Marx should get their act straight.

    Just sayin’

  2. [...] On the Antisemitism Question Who knows if Karl Marx was an anti-Semite? [...]

  3. Bruce E Wright, Ph. says:

    It is amazing to me that anyone who actually reads the essay does not understand these points. I guess ignorance of context and philosophical argument makes charges of anti-semitism easy.

  4. Xanti says:

    Can of weird that a Jew is being called anti-semitic. :P

    Also ironic since Marx, and Luxemburg, Trotsky, and etc are used as examples by anti-semities of Jews leftist and atheist roots.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s