Chart of the day

Posted: 1 December 2015 in Uncategorized
Tags:

NA-CH962A_BIZIN_16U_20151130181514

source

The United States is six and a half years into the current “recovery” but little has been recovering except corporate profits and incomes for the 1 percent.

That’s because spending—both consumer spending and business investment—have basically stopped growing. And, within capitalism, when spending slows down, the economy as a whole stops growing and threatens, once again, to falter.

Consumer spending isn’t growing because, face it, most people’s incomes (whether measured in terms of real wages or median incomes) are stagnant. Whatever spending they are doing (e.g., on cars and higher education) is fueled by taking on more and more debt.

What about investment? While profits (especially from domestic sources) continue to grow, corporations are using those profits not for investment, but for other uses, including stock buybacks, mergers and acquisitions, and CEO salaries.

To put it in other words, the surplus is growing but the handful of large corporations that manage to appropriate most of the surplus are using it to reward themselves and their accomplices.

And, for the economy as a whole, that’s a real problem. It may make a lot of sense for each corporation to keep wages low, profits high, and investment spending down—but it makes no sense for the economy as a whole, including their own long-run profitability.

That, as it turns out, is a contradiction that is central to capitalism.

Comments
  1. If I read the first chart right, it looks like demand in the second chart is still lagging behind the potential supply in which the (rather miserly amount) companies have invested.

    A) Do I have that right?

    B) Is there any data on how much of the investment in structures, equipment, and software/intellectual property is merely repair, replacement, or updates/upgrades (in other words, stuff that really doesn’t do much to increase the supply of goods and or services, but just allows the current supply level to be maintained)?

    C) I note that the graph is using data from 2009. Is there any update to be had on the trend of the charts since then?

    Always love the charts you find. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s