Posts Tagged ‘401(k)’

Save this!

Posted: 27 February 2017 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

article66picture-1439487937

Setting aside enough of the surplus to support workers who have retired is one of the basic tasks any society faces.

Clearly, the United States is failing at that one simple task.

Yes, Americans do have Social Security. But, at an average monthly payment of $1,360 in 2017, it’s obviously not enough.

That’s why American workers are forced to have the freedom to come up with their own savings for retirement. And most are finding it difficult, if not impossible.

Overall, only one-third of American workers are saving anything in a workplace retirement account.

One reason is because, according to a recent study, only 2 out of 5 employees with access to 401(k)s and other defined-contribution retirement saving plans are actually using them. They simply aren’t being paid enough to buy what they need for themselves and their families and, at the same time, to put away money for retirement.

It’s no coincidence that the Census analysis found Americans with higher incomes were more likely to be socking money away for their old age. That dovetails with other data, such as the Federal Reserve’s annual survey on household finances, which found that almost 9 out of 10 Americans with more than $100,000 in annual income have a 401(k), compared with just four out of 10 earning less than $40,000.

The other reason is only 14 percent of companies actually offer these types of retirement plans, far lower than previous estimates.

The low percentage of employers that offer 401(k)s was especially noteworthy, [retirement specialist Arielle] O’Shea said, since previous estimates pegged the number at about 40 percent. “That is a significant problem,” she said.

Yes, indeed, that is a problem. Fourteen percent instead of 40 percent.*

The combined effect is that two-thirds of American workers are simply unable to save enough to fund their own retirements. They will have spent most of their lives working—and then they will struggle to stop working and enjoy their retirement.

Contrary to the advice of countless retirement specialists and politicians, who exhort American workers to tighten their belts and increase their savings, they’re not the ones who have failed. It’s a system that keeps workers’ pay in check and yet relies on their finding a way to accumulate individual savings—it’s that system that has failed American workers.

As I see it, the system that relies on individual decisions to save for retirement can’t be saved. Instead, it should be retired. And then replaced by the obvious alternative: transferring a portion of the growing surplus to workers when they retire. Such a system would be able to provide more generous benefits, starting at an earlier age—exactly what is need right now.

We can even give that system a name. Let’s call it Social Security 2.0.

 

*Now, it’s true, larger employers are more likely to offer 401(k)-style plans than smaller ones. So, 79 percent of Americans do in fact work at places that sponsor retirement plans. The problem is just 41 percent of those workers are making contributions to such a plan—more than 20 points lower than previous estimates.

0826wasserman

Special mention

650 167931_600

2584.strip.zoom

Friends often ask me when I plan to retire. My response is, in 6 years—or perhaps 16 years.

That’s because I and hundreds of millions of my fellow citizens now live in what Thomas Friedman refers to as a “401(k) world.”

For Friedman, it’s a world of individual promise:

We now live in a 401(k) world — a world of defined contributions, not defined benefits — where everyone needs to pass the bar exam and no one can escape the most e-mailed list. . .

If you are self-motivated, wow, this world is tailored for you. The boundaries are all gone. . .Your specific contribution will define your specific benefits much more.

But for the rest of us, the 401(k) world—a world of defined contributions retirement programs, instead of defined benefits—is just a giant scam in which employers have managed to shift all the risk of saving for retirement onto their employees and the financial industry captures a new set of fees. Sure, employers (some of them at least) have to distribute some of their gross profits to their employees’ retirement accounts, and the employees have to come up with another portion out of their wages and salaries. But the risk is all with the employees, since their actual retirement savings depends on what happens in equity and bond markets. Once their initial contributions have been made, employers no longer have to worry about coming up with the funds to keep pensions fully vested. All the risk falls on the employees—and the gains accrue to the lucrative area of managing both employer-mandated and 401(k) retirement accounts.

Matt Yglesias has some sense of what’s going on:

the problem with living in a 401(k) world is that Planet 401(k) is a pretty sucky planet. Here’s the essential shape of 401(k) as a backbone of the retirement system:

— Poor people get absolutely nothing.

— Wealthy people who would have had large savings anyway get a nice tax cut that offers no meaningful incentive effect

— For people in the middle, the quantity of subsidy you receive is linked to the marginal tax rate you pay—in other words, it’s inverse to need.

— A small minority of middle-class people manage to file the paperwork to save an adequate amount and then select a prudent low-fee, broadly diversified fund as their savings vehicle.

— Most middle-class savers end up either undersaving, overtrading, investing in excessively high-fee vehicles or some combination of the three.

— A small number of highly compensated folks now have lucrative careers offering bad investment products to a middle-class mass market based on their ability to swindle people.

Felix Salmon has an even clearer view of what’s going on:

a 401(k) plan is an icon of futility and the way in which the owners of capital extract rents from the owners of labor. . .the 401(k) is a way for both your government and your employer to disown you, and to leave your life savings to be raided by the financial-services industry and its plethora of hidden and invidious fees.

All of which means, in a 401(k) world, employers and banks are making out like bandits, while the rest of us are forced to have the freedom to rely on whatever we can save for retirement, plus the vagaries of financial markets.

In Friedman’s world, we get what we deserve. In my world, I’ll be able to retire in 6—or 16—years.