Posts Tagged ‘poverty’

pb1 pb2

For those of us of a certain age, especially those of us raised in Catholic households, Father Daniel Berrigan—through his activism and poetry, against war and militarism, racism, poverty and inequality—was one of the true consciences of a church and a nation.


Special mention

queen-hrc-otherwords-cartoon TMW2016-04-27color

East_Side_Eviction cropped-eviction-1

In the current century, just as at the beginning of the last one, the dominant discourse of the poor has been plainly wrong.

As Katha Pollitt asks (in her review of Matthew Desmond’s Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City), 

What if the problem isn’t that poor people have bad morals – that they’re lazy and impulsive and irresponsible and have no family values – or that they lack the skills and smarts to fit in with our shiny 21st-century economy? What if the problem is that poverty is profitable?

As it turns out, there is a lot of money to be made from “a dilapidated trailer park or a black neighbourhood of ‘sagging duplexes, fading murals, 24-hour daycares’.”

Tobin Charney makes $400,000 a year out of his 131 trailers, some of which are little better than hovels. Sherrena Tarver, a former schoolteacher who is one of the only black female landlords in the city, makes enough in rents on her numerous properties – some presentable, others squalid – to holiday in Jamaica and attend conferences on real estate.

And, in turn, poor people are held back from the rent they’re forced to have the freedom to pay.

The main condition holding them back, Desmond argues, is rent. The standard measure is that your rent should be no more than 30% of your income, but for poor people it can be 70% or more. After he paid Sherrena his $550 rent out of his welfare cheque, Lamar had only $2.19 a day for the month. When he is forced to repay a welfare cheque he has been sent in error and falls behind on rent, he sells his food stamps for half their face value and volunteers to paint an upstairs apartment, but it is not enough. People such as Lamar live in chronic debt to their landlord, who can therefore oust them easily whenever it is convenient – if they demand repairs, for example, like Doreen, or if a better tenant comes along. Sherrena liked renting to the clients of a for-profit agency that handles – for a fee – the finances of people on disability payments who can’t manage on their own. Money from government programmes intended to help the poor – welfare, disability benefits, the earned-income tax credit – go straight into the landlord’s pocket and, ironically, fuel rising housing costs. Public housing and housing vouchers are scarce. Three in four who qualify for housing assistance get nothing.

There continues to be an enormous amount of poverty in this rich nation—and the system is maintained both because there’s profit to be made by slumlords and because evictions serve to destroy the lives of the poor and the communities they live in.


Yes, the subject today is toilet paper [ht: ja]?

Why? Because it’s just about the perfect illustration of poverty in America.

For low-income families, the discounts shoppers get from buying in bulk are often out of reach — forcing them to pay more for everyday items like toilet paper.

That’s one of the findings of a recent study from the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, which analyzed toilet paper purchases among 100,000 U.S. households over the course of seven years.

Researchers found that low-income families were less able to afford the higher upfront cost of buying items in bulk than households with higher incomes. For example, 36 rolls of two-ply paper might cost about $15, but an individual roll of one-ply paper might cost only $1.

The inability to buy in bulk can hurt a low-income family’s budget in more ways than one, researchers found. Because low-income families can’t afford to stock up, they have to shop more often. This means they miss out on sales — when the toilet paper runs out, you can’t wait for it to go on sale to buy more.

The researchers found that low-income households — those making below $20,000 a year — made just 28.3% of their toilet paper purchases on sale, while families making more than $100,000 took advantage of sales nearly 40% of the time.

One way low-income families did try to save on toilet paper was to buy cheaper brands. . .

Low-income families might benefit more from such things as sales at the beginning of the month or financing options, like a line of credit or payment plans. Unlike with TVs or other big ticket items, most stores don’t usually offer financing options for staples such as toilet paper.

Alternatively, we might consider actually eliminating poverty in America.

child poverty

According to the latest fact sheet from the National Center for Children in Poverty, both the number and percentage of children in or near poverty increased from 2008 to 2014 (the latest year for which data are available).
Here’s what else we know:

  • More than four in ten U.S. children are living close to the poverty line. In 2014, 44 percent of children under age 18 (31.4 million) lived in low-income households and 21 percent lived in poor families (15.4 million). This is much higher than at the start of the Great Recession in 2008, when 39 percent of children were considered low income and 18 percent lived in poor households.
  • Children remain more likely than adults to live in poverty. While 44 percent of children live in low-income households, only one-third of adults between 18 and 64 years of age live in these households. In addition, children are more than twice as likely as adults 65 years and older to live in poor families.
  • While children with a full-time, year-round employed parent are less likely to live in a low-income family, compared to children with parents who work part-time or part-year or who are not employed, it is still the case that 31 percent of children with at least one parent who works full-time, year round (16.1 million) live in low-income families and 9 percent of children with at least one parent who works full-time, year round (4.6 million) live in poor families.

I don’t see how the project of making America either “great again” or “whole” is going to fix the growing problem of child poverty.


Special mention

173208_600 lk122015dAPR


Special mention

172391_600 172325_600