Posts Tagged ‘Vermont’


It is now (almost) possible to walk across the continental United States—East to West, from Maine to Oregon (or California or Washington)—and only step foot in counties that a Republican won in the presidential election (as in the green line in the map above). The only remaining gap is the solid-blue state of Vermont.

Of course, it has long been possible to take a similar walk from North to South—from the Canadian to the Mexican border (the black line on the map).

Just saying. . .


Back in 2011, the communities of Vermont—which Calvin Coolidge referred to as “this brave little state”—managed to survive and rebuild after Tropical Storm Irene.

Now, as Molly Worthen explains, they’re bravely rebuilding the state’s healthcare system, after much pushing and prodding from the Vermont Progressive Party.

The Progressives owe much of their success to the oddities of Vermont politics. But their example offers hope that the most frustrating dimensions of our political culture can change, despite obstacles with deep roots in American history.

Green Mountain Care won’t begin until at least 2017, but Vermont liberals are optimistic. “Americans want to see a model that works,” Senator Bernie Sanders told The Atlantic in December. (Mr. Sanders is an independent, but a longtime ally of the Progressives.) “If Vermont can be that model it will have a profound impact on discourse in this country.”

Before you dismiss that prospect as wishful thinking, consider: That’s how national health care happened in Canada. A third party’s provincial experiment paved the way for national reform. In 1946, the social-democratic government of Saskatchewan passed a law providing free hospital care to most residents. The model spread to other provinces, and in 1957 the federal government adopted a cost-sharing measure that evolved into today’s universal single-payer system.

Take back Vermont

Posted: 28 February 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,


The new campaign to take back Vermont should not be confused with the 2000 campaign to repeal civil unions. This one is about the growing problem of heroin addiction in the Green Mountain State.

Long visible at the street level in towns and cities across the country, the extent of the opiate scourge in rural Vermont burst into the national consciousness last month, when Gov. Peter Shumlin devoted his entire State of the State message to what he said was a “full-blown heroin crisis.” Much of New England is now also reporting record overdoses and deaths.

For some communities just starting to reckon with drugs, Mr. Shumlin’s words were a call to arms; for Rutland, they offered a sense of solidarity as this city of 17,000 moves ahead with efforts to help reclaim its neighborhoods and its young people, not to mention its reputation.

As Gina Tron explains,

Vermont draws lots of out-of-staters who move there thinking it’s some sort of promised land of maple syrup and covered bridges.

Vermont is beautiful—the view from our house was breathtaking, with rolling hills stretching for miles, full of grazing deer in the morning and howling coyotes at night. But the state is also more complicated than its reputation.

“I was expecting more overalls,” one family friend remarked during a visit a few years after we arrived. Another asked if my classmates wore clogs and pigtails to school. They dismissed my Vermont friends as hicks, and saw the state as a wholesome joke. “What kinda crime do they have up there? Someone stole a block of Cabot cheese?”

It’s not just out-of-staters who see Vermont this way—plenty of locals like to claim the state is immune to “big city problems.” But it’s not that there’s less dysfunction in Vermont. It just takes a different, often less visible, form.

That’s why it’s downright dangerous for liberals like Matthew Yglesias to claim that Vermont really is prospering. A low unemployment rate (in a state with a small percentage of formal-sector jobs) and a high median income (in a state that has refashioned itself as a tourist destination and land of second homes) signify very little. Vermont is also a state of impoverished cities and rural areas, where meth labs and sales of cheaper heroin prosper alongside sugar shacks and covered bridges.

Gleaning is an activity that combines a various and changing combination of need and inventiveness.

That combination is best illustrated in Agnès Varda’s extraordinary film, The Gleaners and I, in which she tracks a series of gleaners (who hunt for food, knicknacks, and personal connection) and shows that she, as an artist, is also always a gleaner.

In The Gleaners and I, Varda films herself combing her newly discovered gray hair, and there are many visuals of her aging hands. She frequently “catches” trucks on the freeway, forming a circle with her hand in front of the camera framing the truck in the center, then closing her hand as she drives past them.

Much of this footage is woven into the film to show that Varda, as a film maker, is also a gleaner. This concept is made explicit in the French title, Les glaneurs et la glaneuse, which could be translated as “the gleaners and the gleaneress”.

A different combination of those same qualities—need and inventiveness—is currently being demonstrated across the United States, as the need for food has grown while food-bank contributions have fallen. Therefore, groups such as as the Vermont Food Bank have stepped up their gleaning activity:

The Vermont Food Bank’s gleaning program is no small operation. So far this year, it has gathered more than 230,000 pounds of produce, and there will be more coming in, even as winter arrives. The program has gathered as much as 400,000 pounds of produce in a single year. . .

There is a definite need for the food that the gleaning program salvages. Federal surplus food donations have dwindled sharply this year. The two million pounds of food that the Vermont Food Bank used to receive has been cut by 50%.

“So that’s a million pounds of food that we won’t be distributing,” said Michelle Wallace, program manager for the Food Bank.

Wallace noted that hunger in Vermont is real, and it’s no longer just feeding the elderly or young children in needy families.

“Now we’re seeing working families that aren’t earning enough to put food on the table,” she said.

Hunger can also mean more than a simple lack of food. “Hunger isn’t just about a lack of calories,” Wallace said. “It’s also about a lack of good nutrition.”

The gleaning program is helping fill both gaps: the loss of federal surplus commodities, and the need for nutritious, healthy food. Thus, it has become doubly important.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

One year ago, Tropical Storm Irene devastated large parts of the “brave little state of Vermont.” Here are three paintings by Chester artist James Jahrsdoerfer.

I don’t have a dog in this hunt. But I do have a suggestion.

The hunt I’m referring to is the current spat between Thomas Palley and Randall Wray over Modern Monetary Theory, especially the idea of the government as Employer of Last Resort for unemployed workers.

Fine, battle it out, you two.*

What I want to suggest is it’s a mistake to limit the debate to fiscal and monetary stimulus versus direct government hiring. What about allowing workers to use unemployment benefits (perhaps supplemented by technical advice and additional capitalization) to form worker-owned cooperatives? That way, unemployed workers would be able to get back to work, earn a decent living, and collectively make decisions to help themselves and others in the surrounding community.

As I understand it, it’s the kind of solution behind Italy’s Marcora Law. It might be worth a try in the United States in the midst of the Second Great Depression. We’ll call it the Not-Palley-or-Wray Law.

*Although I do have to remark that it’s a bit of a cheap shot for Palley to use the ConDem government’s punitive scheme to force the long-term unemployed to work unpaid for six months as an example of what is wrong with the kind of policies advocated by Wray and other Modern Monetary Theorists.


I just found out [ht: gh] that my own senator, Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), has just introduced legislation that would expand employee ownership of businesses in Vermont and throughout the country. The announcement doesn’t explicitly mention unemployment but it does include funding to states through the Department of Labor to establish and expand employee ownership centers and the creation of a U.S. Employee Ownership Bank to provide loans to help workers purchase businesses through an employee stock ownership plan or a worker-owned cooperative.

Of mines and roads

Posted: 6 December 2011 in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

In updates to two stories I’ve been following (e.g., here and here): Massey Energy has been forced to pay more than $200 million for killing 29 miners, while Vermont has managed to rebuild the roads destroyed by Tropical Storm Irene.

Both are examples of the effects of a combination of collective organization and government assistance: the United Mine Workers and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, in the former case; local communities and state and federal government agencies, in the latter.