Here’s another of my charts—this one for the composition of income of the top 1 percent—from the latest data on inequality in the United States created and disseminated by Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty.
This chart shows the sources of the income going to the top 1 percent—basically, the various ways the members of the top 1 percent are able to capture a share of the economy-wide surplus: in the form of wages (defined as wages and salaries and pensions), profits (profits from S-Corporations, Partnerships, and sole proprietorship businesses plus farm income), dividends, interest, and rents.
So, for example, in 2015, the top 1 percent received their portion of the surplus as wages (53.7 percent), profits (32.3 percent), dividends (8.6 percent), interest (3.2 percent), and rents (2.2 percent).*
I’ve included the actual data below.
The previous charts are here and here. As always, readers should feel free to use this chart and reproduce it as they wish.
Wages | Profits | Dividends | Interest | Rents | |
1979 | 59.0 | 17.0 | 12.5 | 8.0 | 3.5 |
1980 | 60.5 | 13.3 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 3.6 |
1981 | 62.7 | 7.8 | 12.4 | 13.3 | 3.7 |
1982 | 62.6 | 8.2 | 12.3 | 12.9 | 3.9 |
1983 | 65.5 | 9.8 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 3.0 |
1984 | 66.1 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 12.4 | 2.7 |
1985 | 63.6 | 11.0 | 9.6 | 12.3 | 3.4 |
1986 | 65.7 | 11.1 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 1.7 |
1987 | 63.9 | 17.2 | 7.2 | 10.4 | 1.4 |
1988 | 59.8 | 21.2 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 1.5 |
1989 | 56.7 | 22.3 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 1.8 |
1990 | 57.9 | 22.3 | 6.8 | 11.1 | 2.0 |
1991 | 57.4 | 23.0 | 6.6 | 11.0 | 2.1 |
1992 | 61.6 | 23.6 | 5.4 | 7.1 | 2.3 |
1993 | 62.1 | 23.8 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 2.6 |
1994 | 59.1 | 26.8 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 2.7 |
1995 | 59.2 | 27.3 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 2.4 |
1996 | 59.7 | 27.0 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 2.4 |
1997 | 60.3 | 26.7 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 2.5 |
1998 | 61.1 | 26.6 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 2.4 |
1999 | 62.1 | 26.1 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 2.3 |
2000 | 63.0 | 24.7 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 2.2 |
2001 | 61.7 | 26.5 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 2.5 |
2002 | 61.2 | 27.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 2.7 |
2003 | 60.2 | 27.7 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
2004 | 58.4 | 28.4 | 6.5 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
2005 | 54.8 | 30.9 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 2.6 |
2006 | 53.5 | 30.1 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 2.4 |
2007 | 54.3 | 27.7 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 2.3 |
2008 | 55.7 | 28.3 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 2.9 |
2009 | 56.4 | 30.7 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 2.6 |
2010 | 57.2 | 29.2 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.6 |
2011 | 58.4 | 29.0 | 6.4 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
2012 | 54.9 | 30.0 | 9.2 | 3.2 | 2.8 |
2013 | 56.7 | 30.6 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
2014 | 55.1 | 31.2 | 7.7 | 2.8 | 3.3 |
2015 | 53.7 | 32.3 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
*These are the wages that distort the usual calculations of the profit-wage ratio (as I explained here and here). To obtain a more accurate sense of capital and labor shares, the wages of the 1 percent should be subtracted from the labor share and added to the capital share.
[…] Chart of the day […]
[…] charts in this series can be found here, here, here, and […]
[…] Other charts in this series can be found here, here, and here. […]
[…] on a few longer series last year—on inequality in the United States (in four parts: here, here, here, and here), the U.S. healthcare system (in seven parts: here, here, here, here, here, here, and […]